12/10/2023 0 Comments Free acdsee 3.1![]() ![]() Having programs that work is more important to me than the latest Microsoft OS which should be a servant, not a master. Look, all I want is to find a fix to get Win10 working again. And since WIn10 used to work, I'm assuming that Microsoft broke it - either deliberately to force people to buy more software or accidentally through incompetence. My point is that I have yet to find an alternative that does the job I want. If necessary, I could probably reinvent the wheel and write my own image viewer in C (which I've used professionally on PCs to create WIndows programs) but I'd rather not. My first experience of bigger computers was in 1969, and my first taste of programming them in machine code (Easycoder let you write everything as octal rather than mnemonics if you so wished) was in 1971. If I did manage to find another photo viewer, how long before that no longer runs, or email fails, or my word processor won't run? Win10 seems too big a risk by far.īTW, my first experience of small computers was a Sinclair Spectrum, followed by the PCW512 and the Amstrad 1640. So far, the only thing that's broke is Win10 as far as I'm concerned. I am prepared in principle to switch to another program if necessary, but so far unless I've missed settings IrfanView, ACDSee pro 10 and Faststone are ruled out as lacking facilities that the old ACDSee 2.4 has. I have tried the simple solutions advocated on line to check (and change if necessary) the security settings of the vhd, and run Virtaulbox as administrator, all with no effect. I have tried using the Disk2vhd tool last night, but the vhd created refused to work due to a "can't open" error. That I have a Win7 system is simply because I used a clone Win7 to invoke the Win10 to let me revert when it failed. I don't have any media to create a Win10 Pro VM as it was an update from Win7 Pro done over the internet. To Stephen I'd suggest maybe a laptop running an older os with the apps you want to keep using, or biting the bullet and looking into a more modern app perhaps of a different make, that you could live with but that wouldn't break the bank. Workarounds can be damned clunky, and some of them take up precious desk space. Even the planet we live on won't be here for ever.Īt one point I had very functional versions of a couple of workhorse programs that were no longer going to work on Windows beyond XP, and would be rather expensive to upgrade or replace. It took some time for me to realise that though computers could be enabling and even empowering, using them tended to lock you into an endless manufacturers' cash-cow cycle of interdependent hardware and software upgrades. ![]() Anyone remember Windows 95, and what a crappy, crash-prone system that was? Anyway. Then I began to find out that computers were able to do more than that, in the realm of imaging - but only if I upgraded. But the machine enabled me to do what I wanted it for, which was text-based. When I got my first desktop computer back in 1998, I was an innocent (and there was a big learning curve). As long as I have the hardware to run Win7, if I have to, I'll run it. I don't use it to run an operating system and chop and change as Microsoft In this instance) decides which programs I'm not able to run because backwards compatibility is a concept they haven't really embraced. I reiterate - I use a computer to do certain things and run certain software. If Win10 can't be fixed, then fine I won't use it. I've rejected every modern file viewer I've looked at as not having them.Īll I really want is to know why Win10 Pro stopped working and if it can't be fixed, then it goes.Ĭome on, people, accept that under no circumstances will I run a later program that lacks things I want. ![]() Without them, no deal.ġ and 3 are essential, and red lines for me. So far, I've concluded that they don't exist. Tell me where the tick boxes are (under "Filing" on earlier versions) for the options "Move/Copy duplicate files" where I can choose between "Rename" (with choice of how the new name is formed) or "Skip when identical". I could get to live with it if I had to - but so far I don't as I can run 2.4 on WIn7.ģ. When viewing an image, get rid of the manage Photos View Develop Edit bar that I find intrusive. This isn't acceptable when I don't have to put up with it.Ģ. I've just tried version 10, and portrait orientation seems to force less than full screen height, and I can't eliminate white borders left and right. The later versions let me fit the window only, with wasted white space to the sides and the image not as large as it could be. 2.4 lets me have the image full screen height (if portrait) or full screen width (if landscape) with the resultant resized window only as large as it needs to be (no ugly and wasteful white space to the sides). Make the image display fit the screen, NOT the window. OK, if people want me to swap, then I need to know how toġ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |